Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57436 (AP)

Gummadi Venkata Siva Nagendra Mani, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/32492/2016 · 2025-10-08

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010722142016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32492/2016 Between: 1. GUMMADI VENKATA SIVA NAGENDRA MANI,, W/O. GUMMADI SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 6-58-5/1, SRIMIKA NAGAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT- 530026. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GAJUWAKA ZONE, VISAKHAPATNAM-530026. 3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, CHINAGANTYADA SECTION, GAZUWAKA, APEPDCI, VIZAG, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. SIRASAPALLI SADAMMA, W/O. LATE SIRASAPAPPLI VARAHAULU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, DOOR NO. 26-2-33, CHINGANTYADA, OLD GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM- 530026. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, more particualrly 2nd and 3rd respondents in not considering the reprsentations 2 dated: 04.08.2016 and 08.08.2016 for granting of illegal approvals obtained through online by 4th respondent herein vide File.No. 1086/1360/B/Z5/LAR/2016 and consequent Proceedings of the 2nd rspondent's endorsement Vide Proceedings No.B.A.No.10174/2016/ACP- V/G2, dated: 01.08.2016 and Electricity connection rspectively under New Electricity Connection No.13412 as illegal, against the law, unconstitutional, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 40193 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dated: 04.08.2016 and 08.08.2016, pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 40194 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the proceedings of the 2nd respondent herein vide File No. 1087/1360/B/Z5/LAR/2016 and consequent proceedings of the 2nd respondent's endorsement vide proceedings No.B.A.No.10174/2016/ACP-V/G2, dated: 01.08.2016, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V UMA DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. A V S LAXMI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- The present writ petition is filed, aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the representations dated 04.08.2016 and 08.08.2016. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent, on written instructions, submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been adequately addressed by the respondents and the building permission granted to the 4th respondent has been revoked. 3. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt: 09.10.2025 SR