APHC010200312021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11425/2021 Between: 1. M.CHINNA KRISHNA, S/O.MUDDALA BOMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, 2. DHANANJANEYULU, S/O.PEDDA OBULESHU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, 3. JAYA RAMI REDDY, S/O.T.NAGIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST. 4. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/O.K. BAYAPU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 5. CHANDRAYUDU, S/O.MUDDALA AVULAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 6. AKKULAPPA, S/O.M.PEDDA NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 7. SRINIVASULU, S/O.K.NARASIRNHULU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 8. NARASIMHULU, S/O.M.NARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 9. RAMBABU, S/O.M.CHINNA NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 10. RAJAPPA, S/O.M.ERRANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 11. CHAKRAPANI, S/O.M.AKKULAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 12. NAGARJUNA, S/O.T.RARNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 13. V.THIPPAMMA, W/O.LATE CHODAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 14. YELLAMMA, W/O. LATE NAGABHUSHANA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 15. K.VENKATA RAMIILU, S/O. LATE NAGABBUSHANA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 16. K.NAGENDRA, S/O. LATE NAGABHUSHANA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF SUBBARAYUNIPALLI, PEDAPALLI, PUTTAPARTHY MANDAL, 2 ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT AT ANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DHARMAVARAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF NILE, KOTHACHERUVU CIRCLE, KOTHACHERUVU, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PUTTAPARTHY RURAL POLICE STATION, PUTTAPARTHY VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. C NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O.C.GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULURIST, R/O.PEDAPALLI VILLAGE, PUTTAPARTHY MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 7. C SRIDHAR REDDY, S/O.C.GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULURIST, R/O.PEDAPALLI VILLAGE, PUTTAPARTHY MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 8. C RAJAMMA, W/O.C.GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O.RACHAPALLI VILLAGE, PUTTAPARTHY MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 9. C BABYSEETHAMMA, D/O.LATE C.GOVINDA REDDY, W/O.NARASIMHA REDDY, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O.PEDAPALLI VILLAGE, PUTTAPARTHY MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 10. B NAGA SENA REDDY, S/O.LATE C.GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. TEACHER, R/O.MIG, 24E, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 11. SMT UMA, W/O. PRABHAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O.H-43, KHD COLONY, GANDHINAGAR, BALLERY, KARNATAKA STATE. 12. C PADMAVATHAMMA, W/O.LATE C.GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O.PEDAPALLI VILLAGE, PUTTAPARTHY MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 2. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 3 to 5 in repeatedly insisting the petitioners to appear before them and settle to the terms of respondents 6 to 12 by force out of the court, as illegal, arbitrary, unwarranted, unconstitutional and in violation of the rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with the petitioners possession over their land in Survey Nos.410/1, admeasuring Ac.1.01 cents, 410/3, admeasuring Ac.0.15 cents, 410/4, admeasuring Ac.0.44 cents and 411/2, admeasuring Ac.1.30 cents in total Ac.2.90 cents of Pedapalli Revenue village in Puttaparthy Mandal of Ananthapuram District and also personal liberty of the petitioners.” 2. None represented for the Petitioners. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not calling the Petitioners and not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to summon the Petitioners to the Police Station without there being any crime registered against them and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondents. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.10.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.11425 of 2021 Dt.09.10.2025 Dinesh