Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57430 (KAR)

MR. SREEVATSAV RAJANAMPALLISAI SARAN DINSHAW, v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER / MANAGER

WP/29363/2024 · 2025-09-22

B M Shyam Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38370 WP No. 29363 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 29363 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. SREEVATSAV RAJANAMPALLISAI SARAN DINSHAW, S/O SAI RAMESH BABU RAJANAMPALLI, AGE ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO FLAT NO 305, 3RD FLOOR SITUATED AT S V RALIA BLATHUR MAIN ROAD, KADUGODI, BANGALORE 560067 2. MR ASEERVATHAM M S/O LATE SRI R ANTHIAH AGE ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO FLAT NO 206, 2ND FLOOR SITUATED AT S V RALIA BLATHUR MAIN ROAD, KADUGODI, BANGALORE 560067 3. MR PRAFULLA BHERA S/O MR SANATAN BEHERA, AGE ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO FLAT NO 406, 4TH FLOOR SITUATED AT S V RALIA BLATHUR MAIN ROAD, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38370 WP No. 29363 of 2024 KADUGODI, BANGALORE 560067 4. MR KAUSHIK DAS GUPTA S/O SRI SHAYAMAL DAS GUPTA AGE ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO FLAT NO 002, GROUND FLOOR SITUATED AT S V RALIA BLATHUR MAIN ROAD, KADUGODI, BANGALORE 560067 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHARATH KUMAR SHETTY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER / MANAGER BANK OF BAORDA CHITTOR BRANCH, NO 3-32/4, OPPOSITE LITTLE FLOWER E M SCHOOL, CB ROAD, CHITTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH 517002 2. SRI D DAMODARA CHETTY S/O D GOPAL CHETTY AGE ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO S-3, BALAJI RESIDENCY, SARVOBOUMA NAGAR, B G ROAD, BANGALORE 56007 3. MRS M SUJANA JAYANTHI W/O SRI M SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38370 WP No. 29363 of 2024 R/AT FLAT NO 202, DOOR NO 15-8-77/12 BHAGYA SAI RESIDENCY, OPP CENTURY CLUB, MAHARANI PETA, VISHAKAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 517002 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIGNESH S SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 12.02.2024 ISSUED BY THE R-1, UNDER SARFAESI ACT AS PER ANNEXURE-A; DIRECT TO THE R-1 IS NOT PRECIPITATED THE MATTER AGAINST THE PETITIONER SCHEDULE PROPERTY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER This Court's previous order dated 10.09.2025 reads as under: "None appears for the petitioners and the petition is listed as urgency is pleaded by the learned counsel for the respondents asserting that there is an unconditional interim order. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38370 WP No. 29363 of 2024 The petition could be dismissed for default but to extend another opportunity, the office is directed to re-list this petition as part of the First List on 19.09.2025 observing that the petition could be dismissed for default if there is continued absence. The interim order granted earlier is continued to be in force till the next date of hearing." None appears for the petitioner and as such, the petition stands dismissed for default. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB