Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5743 (JHR)

DAMIEN SOCIAL WELFARE CENTRE,THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR NAMELY AJAY TIRU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPT OF REGISTRATION, REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS

WPC/1132/2025 · 2025-06-10

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14971 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1132 of 2025 ------ Damien Social Welfare Centre, a registered society, having is office at RC3F+J98, Shiv Temple, Gandhi Bhawan, Government Polytechnic Rd. Opp. Daninath, P.O. and P.S. Jharudih, District Dhanbad through its Director namely Ajay Tiru, son of Raphael Tiru, resident of Golmuri, opposite Doordarshan Kendra, P.O. and P.S. Golmuri, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Registration, Revenue and Land Reforms, officiating from his office at Project Bhawan, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi 2. Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & District Dhanbad 3. Circle Officer, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & District Dhanbad .... .... .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Pallav, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.C. Sinha, AC to GA III . ------ Order No.03 / Dated : 10.06.2025 Instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for direction to remove the scheduled property from the prohibited list of the National Generic Document Registration System (NGDRS) by which the land has been put in prohibited list for registration under the order of the Deputy Commissioner. 2. As per the case of the Petitioner the land pertains to Khata No.136 measuring an area 27 Kathas, 14 Chhatak and 35 Square feet, Mouza Hirapur, Dhanbad, was part of the Jharia Raj Estate and was settled by its Manager in favour of Late Kshitiz Chandra Chattopadhyay vide registered Patta executed on 12th December, 1928. 3. The petitioner purchased the land by two registered sale deed executed in the year 1979 and 1985 and after the purchase, the land was duly mutated in his name. By the impugned prohibited list, the scheduled land has been put in the non-registrable category. The petitioner submitted a representation which was registered as Miscellaneous Case No.8 of 2020 for release of land from the prohibited list, which has not been disposed of till date. 2025:JHHC:14971 4. It is argued by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that Deputy Commissioner is denuded of the power to put any land in the prohibited list of transfer in view of the ratio laid down by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 847 of 2023. 5. It appears from the submissions advanced on behalf of petitioner that Miscellaneous Case No.8 of 2020 is still pending before the Deputy Commissioner which has been filed for release of the land from the prohibited list. Under the circumstance, Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad is directed to dispose of the said Miscellaneous Case No.8 of 2020 within six weeks of the order in the light of the settled law on the point. Writ Petition is disposed of. Interlocutory Application, if any, is also disposed of. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit