Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57421 (AP)

Smt. Budigi Ramadevi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/3645/2021 · 2025-10-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010059052021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3645/2021 Between: 1. SMT. BUDIGI RAMADEVI, W/O ANKAIAH, AGE 60 YEARS. 2. B.ANKAIAH, S/O LATE VENKATAIAH, AGE 65 YEARS, (BOTH PETITIONERS ARE WIFE AND HUSBAND AND RESIDING IN THE SAME ADDRESS I.E R/O 39/592, NETAJI ROAD, ARAVIND NAGAR, KADAPA KADAPA DISTRICT.) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, AMARAVATI. 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, (CBCID), AP DGP HEAD QUARTERS, 1ST FLOOR, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENAMALURU POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 7. CHITIPIREDDINAGARJUNA, S/O RAMANAIAH, AGE 36 YEARS, FLAT NO 102, IDL APARTMENTS, NTR COLONY, KATTA ROAD, TADIGADAPA NEW BRIDGE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3645 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature in WRIT of MANDAMUS aggrieved by the action of the Respondents in not considering the Petitioners representation dated 23.11.2020 and 16.12.2020 for conducting proper inquiry the crime in FIR No 728 of 2020 dated 23.11.2020 on the file of Penamaluru Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District and not transfer the same to CBCID inquiry or Kadapa District for conduct the joint investigation along with crime in FIR No 31/2020 dated 16.2.2020 Chinnachowk Police Station, Kadapa District which is highly illegal, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and violations of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary Articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent to transfer the investigation of crime in FIR No 728 of 2020 dated 23.11.2020 on the file of Penamaluru Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District to Kadapa District or CBCID investigation and pass…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.10.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 3645 of 2021 Dated.09.10.2025 UPS 127