‘ % s APHC010538242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ^ THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27929 OF 2025 Between: Bode Ramachandra Yadav, aged about 42 years, President of Bharatha Chaitanya Yuvajana Party, S/0 Bode Muneppa, Occupation- President of a Political Party, R/0 D.No.31-39/9, Sri Sunanda Nilayam, Kotha indiu, LIC Colony, Punganur, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh- 517247 ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, A.P. State Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur Department of Home, District 2. The Director General of Police, A.P.Police Headquarters, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Anakapalli, Anakapalli District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narsipatnam, Anakapalli District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Circle inspector of Police, Nakkapalli, Anakapalli District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Nakkapalli, Anakapalli District Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents 1 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the ^xircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or any other order or direction particularly oneifri'fhe nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of Respondent Authorities in not allowing seamless movement of the petitioner by denying his permission vide communication by Respondent No.3 dated 12.10.2025 and for completing restricting the protests as per proceedings in No.05/Dis/SDPO-K/2025 dated 31.07.2025 as Violative of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct Respondent Authorities specifically Respondent No.3 to Respondent No.6 to make necessary arrangements and allow the petitioner along with Y Category CRPF Security Personell, his followers and media personnel to visit Rajaiahpeta Village, Nakkapally Mandal of Anakapalli District to secure the ends of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents specifically Respondent No.3 to Respondent No. 6 to provide necessary arrangements for the petitioner’s visit along with his Y Category CRPF Security Personnel, followers and media personnel to visit Rajaiahpeta Village, Nakkapally Mandal of Anakapalli District in the interim pending disposal of the main Writ Petition in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI UMESH CHANDRA P.V.G. Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: APHC010538242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) U [3396] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 27929/2025 Between: 1.BODE RAMACHANDRA YADAV, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, PRESIDENT OF BHARATHA CHAITANYA YUVAJANA PARTY, S/0 BODE MUNEPPA, OCCUPATION- PRESIDENT OF A POLITICAL PARTY, R/0 D.NO. 31-39/9, SRI SUNANDA NILAYAM, KOTHA INDIU, LIC COLONY,PUNGANUR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 517247 ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSIPATNAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6.THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAKKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH A. P. STATE A.P.POLICE DISTRICT, NAKKAPALLI, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may other order or direction be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or any particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of Respondent Authorities in not allowing seamless movement of the petitioner by denying his permission vide communication by Respondent No.3 dated 12.10.2025 and for completing restricting the protests as per proceedings in No.05/Dis/SDPO-K/2025dated 31.07.2025as Violative of 2 'a Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct Respondent Authorities specifically Respondent No.3 to Respondent No.6 to make necessary arrangements and allow the petitioner along with Y Category CRPF Security Personnel, his followers and media personnel to visit Rajaiahpeta Village, Nakkapally Mandal of Anakapalli District to secure the ends of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.UMESH CHANDRA PVG Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue an appropriate writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of Respondent Authorities in not allowing seamless movement of the petitioner by denying his permission vide communication by Respondent No.3 dated 12.10.2025 and for completing restricting the protests as per proceedings in No.05/Dis/SDPO-K/2025dated 31.07.2025as Violative of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct Respondent Authorities specifically Respondent No.3 to Respondent No.6 to make arrangements and allow the petitioner along with Y Category CRPF Security Personnel, his followers and media personnel to visit Rajaiahpeta Village, Nakkapally Mandal of Anakapalli District to secure the ends of justice and to pass ..." necessary Heard Sri Umesh Chandra PVG, learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent/Sta te. Perused the material on record. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that let there be a direction to respondent No.3 to dispose of the Petitioner's representation, which is pending for consideration. Learned Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering I the submissions, it is apposite to direct respondent No.3 to take an appropriate decision over the representation of the Petitioner by tomorrow i.e, 10.10.2025 evening in the light of the Order passed by this Court on 03.09.2025 in WP No.21157 of 2025. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- T. SRINIVASA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Home, A.P. State Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District The Director General of Police, A.P. Police Headquarters, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. The Superintendent of Police, Anakapalli, Anakapalli District, Andhra Pradesh. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narsipatnam, Anakapalli District, Andhra Pradesh. The Circle inspector of Police, Nakkapalli, Anakapalli District, Andhra Pradesh. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Nakkapalli, Anakapalli District Andhra Pradesh One CC to SRI. UMESH CHANDRA P.V.G., Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. sree HIGH COURT DATED:09/10/2025 ORDER WP NO. 27929 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS