- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45703 WP No. 28747 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 28747 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: VINAY S/O NAGARAJA YADAV AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ADVOCATE HAVING OFFICE AT NO.302 , HMS COMPLEX, CUBBONPET, BANGALORE 560002. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGENDRA M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT MS BUILDING DR. B. R. MABEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560001. REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DIVISION 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING K.H. ROAD SHANTHINAGARA BANGALORE 560027. Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45703 WP No. 28747 of 2025 3. TAHSILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK KANDAYA BHAVAN BANGALORE 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR., AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO PROVIDE GENI EXTRACT OF KONAPPANA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR RELIEF THAT THIS COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO GRANT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER The petitioner has sought for a direction to respondent No.2 to provide Geni Extract of Konappana Agrahara Village, Begur Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate files a memo which is annexed with a copy of the Geni Register. 3. In the light of the same, matter does not call for any further adjudication. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45703 WP No. 28747 of 2025 4. The grievance of the litigants like the petitioner ought not to procrastinated when documents sought for are within the possession of the Government, the same are to be furnished unless there is any legal bar with due despatch. The respondent authorities are well advised to redress the grievance of the litigants expeditiously without driving the litigants to the court. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DL CT: JL