Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010197122025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10212/2025 Between:
1. M ANURADHA, W/O LATE SHIVA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 24-81-1/10, FLAT NO. 102, HARISH VICTORIOUS APARTMENT, VISAKHAPATNAM -
530026. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, GVMC, ZONE-VI, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER, GVMC, ZONE - VI, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. T MADHAVI, W/O RAVINDRANATH TAGORE, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, BUT MAJOR. RESIDENT OF D.NO.26-32-1, CHAITANYA NAGAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents Nos. 2, 3 and 4 in taking appropriate action on the Petitioners complaint dated 07.04.2025 against the Building Approval No. 1086/5200/B/26/SAM/2024 in favour of the unofficial Respondent No.5 in respect of the petitioner's site admeasuring 400 square yards situated at Survey No. 186/1, Plot No. 11, Patta No. 263, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 to consider the said complaint of the petitioner in accordance with the law, and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 not to issue final approval to the Unofficial Respondent No.5 relating to Building Approval No. 1086/5200/B/26/SAM/2024 in respect of the admeasuring 400 square yards situated at Survey No. 186/1, Plot No. 11, Patta No. 263, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the above writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KALEEMULLA S Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. LALAM SYAMANTHA
2.
GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION No.10212 of 2025
ORDER:
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 07.04.2025.
2. The learned standing counsel for the respondents 2 to 4 submits that the respondents have duly considered the representation of the petitioner and also passed an order vide endorsement dated 15.04.2025, the same was served on the petitioner as well.
3. The learned counsel for the 5th respondent submits that there is a dispute with regard to the title of the property and that the 5th respondent also filed WP.No.13370 of 2025, challenging the
order passed in LAC.No.71 of 2024 in OS.No.6 of 2024. The Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court had directed no further alienation permissible on the basis of the Award dated
16.03.2024.
4. Considering the submissions and also considering the endorsement dated 15.04.2025, the present writ petition is closed, leaving it open for the petitioner to challenge the appropriate proceedings.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed without costs.
As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
____________________
JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 09.10.2025 KGM
83 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION No.10212 of 2025 Date: 09.10.2025
KGM