Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57407 (ALL)

BECHAN RAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIB/1867/2025 · 2025-05-19

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84274 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1867 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bechan Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rudresh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard Mr. Rudresh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Sonkar, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. The instant petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent no.3 to decide the recall application of petitioner filed in Case No.363 to 367 of 2017 (Sarkar Vs. Rjbahadur and Others), under Section 9-A (2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act as expeditiously as possible within reasonable period." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the recall application filed on behalf of the petitioner is pending before respondent no.3 / Consolidation Officer, Kirtapur, District- Jaunpur since 5.2.2024, as such, direction should be issued for expeditious disposal of pending restoration application within time bound period. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that the restoration application filed by the petitioner is barred by limitation. 5. I have considered the argument advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 6. There is no dispute about the fact that the restoration application dated 5.2.2024 filed by petitioner is barred by limitation. 7. No case for expeditious disposal of time barred proceeding is made out. 8. The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 20.5.2025 Rameez Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad