(O&M) p. 1 107 Shiv Kumar Gupta ...... Petitioner versus Punya Deep Sharma, Tehsildar, Chandigarh ..... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present :- Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parminder Kanwar, Advocate and Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for the respondent. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent submits that even though the demolition drive was undertaken on 08.08.2025 and some of the part was demolished, however, keeping in view that the concrete slabs are joint, damage to the adjoining building was apprehended. He further submits that, in order to carry out the demolition effectively, notices have been issued to the occupants of the adjoining buildings and the same shall be carried out within a reasonable period. POOJA SHARMA 2025.09.25 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) p. 2 Keeping in view the request made by Mr. Kanwar, Advocate for the respondent, the Chandigarh Administration-respondent is granted time till 28.02.2026. 3 It is made clear that no further extension of time will be granted. 4 Petition stands disposed off accordingly. ( PANKAJ JAIN ) 24.09.2025 JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2025.09.25 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document