Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5740 (JHR)

DHANANJAY KUMBHAKAR ALIAS ALU KUMBHAKAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1322/2025 · 2025-02-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1322 of 2025 ------ Dhananjay Kumbhakar @ Alu Kumbhakar, aged about 30 years, son of Late Kalo Kumbhakar, Resident of village- Suranga, P.O.- Suranga, and P.S. – Tisra (Alakdiha OP), District- Dhanbad, State- Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 25-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Tisra (Alakdiha O.P.) P.S. Case No.64 of 2024 instituted under Sections 333, 126 (2), 115 (2), 74, 76, 303 (2), 352, 351 (2), 351 (3) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner made lurking trespass in the house of the informant- Laxmi Devi and took Rs.5,000/- from the box and when the informant lady tried to caught hold of the petitioner, the petitioner outraged the modesty of the informant and threatened not to disclose about the incident to anyone. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner and the informant are neighbours and there is dispute since long between them, hence, this false case has been foisted with a manufactured story. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.- 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Tisra (Alakdiha O.P.) P.S. Case No.64 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/