PUSHPENDER SINGH v. ANURAG RASTOGI, IAS AND OTHERS
COCP/3311/2025 · 2025-08-12
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57391 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57391 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 108
Pushpinder Singh
Sh. Anurag Restogi, Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana and others
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
proceedings the order dated Bench of this Court in C vs. State of Haryana and others” and CWP
“Shyam Sunder and others vs. State of Haryana and another” vide which the respondents were directed allowances of the post of have performed the duties of the said posts, with all consequential benefits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.” COCP-3311-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.3311 of 2025
Date of decision : Pushpinder Singh Versus Sh. Anurag Restogi, IAS, Financial Commissioner Revenue & Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Jatinder Kumar Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent the order dated 04.10.2024 (Annexure P Bench of this Court in CWP-9415-2019 vs. State of Haryana and others” and CWP
“Shyam Sunder and others vs. State of Haryana and another” vide which the respondents were directed “….to release the pay and allowances of the post of Section Officer for the period the petitioners have performed the duties of the said posts, with all consequential benefits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.”
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3311 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-12.08.2025 …..Petitioner IAS, Financial Commissioner Revenue & Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana and others …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Kumar Kamboj, Advocate AAG, Haryana.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying (Annexure P-1) passed by a co-ordinate titled as “Pushpender Singh vs. State of Haryana and others” and CWP-1281-2020 titled as
“Shyam Sunder and others vs. State of Haryana and another” vide
“….to release the pay and Section Officer for the period the petitioners have performed the duties of the said posts, with all consequential benefits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.13 21.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Status/Compliance Report dated Shri C.G. Rajinikaanthan, IAS, Director General, Treasuries and Accounts Department, Haryana, Chandigarh. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for t Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper book.
directions dated 04.10.2024 have been duly complied with and necessary compliance has been made. Learned c refers to para 11 of the said Compliance Report, wherein it is recorded as follows :
the State draws the attention of this Court to the stay granted by the Division Bench of this Court in the LPA case, titled as “State of Ha others” wherein, vide order dated 11.7.2025 (Annexure R COCP-3311-2025 (O & M)
Learned counsel for the State has filed Status/Compliance Report dated 08.08.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri C.G. Rajinikaanthan, IAS, Director General, Treasuries and Accounts Department, Haryana, Chandigarh. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for t Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper
Learned counsel for the respondent directions dated 04.10.2024 have been duly complied with and essary compliance has been made. Learned c refers to para 11 of the said Compliance Report, wherein it is recorded as follows :-
“xxx xxx xxx
11. That admittedly, the petitioner has already received a sum of Rs. 6,83,465/ Superintending Engineer, Bhiwani vide pay order dated 13.03.2025 and Rs. 2,58,495/ Superintending Engineer, Rewari vide pay order dated 27.03.2025 on account of arrears of salary for services rendered by him as SO (Part (Copies of pay order dated 13.03.2025 and 27.03.2025 are attached as Annexu xxx xxx xxx” In respect of consequential benefits, learned counsel for the State draws the attention of this Court to the stay granted by the Division Bench of this Court in the LPA- case, titled as “State of Haryana and another vs. Shyam Sunder and others” wherein, vide order dated 11.7.2025 (Annexure R
2
Learned counsel for the State has filed the 08.08.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri C.G. Rajinikaanthan, IAS, Director General, Treasuries and Accounts Department, Haryana, Chandigarh. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-
Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the directions dated 04.10.2024 have been duly complied with and essary compliance has been made. Learned counsel for the State refers to para 11 of the said Compliance Report, wherein it is recorded xxx That admittedly, the petitioner has already received a sum of Rs. 6,83,465/- from Superintending Engineer, Bhiwani vide pay order ated 13.03.2025 and Rs. 2,58,495/- from Superintending Engineer, Rewari vide pay order dated 27.03.2025 on account of arrears of salary for services rendered by him as SO (Part-I). (Copies of pay order dated 13.03.2025 and 27.03.2025 are attached as Annexure R-10 colly). In respect of consequential benefits, learned counsel for the State draws the attention of this Court to the stay granted by the -1989-2025 filed in the main ryana and another vs. Shyam Sunder and others” wherein, vide order dated 11.7.2025 (Annexure R-8) the effect VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.13 21.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
and operation of directions ‘with has been stayed.
be passed in the present petition, the same is
August 12 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / Whether Reportable Yes / No
COCP-3311-2025 (O & M) and operation of directions ‘with regard t has been stayed. In view of the above, no further directions are required be passed in the present petition, the same is Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 12, 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
3 to all consequential benefits’ In view of the above, no further directions are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.13 21.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document