1 2025:CGHC:52221 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12262 of 2025 • Rupendra Kumar Sinha S/o Shri Firat Ram Sinha Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward No.- 63, Street No.- 01 Near Ashirvad Bhavan, Civic Centre, P.S. And Tehsil Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 490006 ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Pin- 492002 2. Under Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Engineer In Chief Rural Engineering Service, Vikas Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer Chhattisgarh Rural Engineering Services, Bemetara, Dist- Bemetara (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 27.10.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the transfer order dated 07.10.2025 passed by the respondent authority by which the petitioner who is working as Sub-Engineer in the Chhattisgarh Rural Engineering MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.10.28 12:05:47 +0530 2 Service has been transferred from Rural Engineering Service, Sub-Division, Berla, District - Bemetara (C.G.) to Janpad Panchayat, Duldula, District - Jashpur (C.G.). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has personal difficulty as he is suffering from spin problem and getting regular treatment in Ramakrishna Hospital, Raipur and Sparsh Hospital, Bhilai. Thus, he would submit that the transfer order dated 07.10.2025 may be quashed. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 4. From the pleadings made in the petition, it is quite vivid that the petitioner is posted at the present place of posting since 2019 and prior to that he has remained posted at Tilda only. Thus, looking to the personal difficulty, the petitioner is allowed to make representation which may be decided in accordance with law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of S.K. Nausad Rahaman & others Vs. Union of India & others reported in 2022 (12) SCC 1 by the respondents. 5. With aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish