Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57390 (ALL)

NEETU KUMARI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/15277/2025 · 2025-05-14

Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:79753-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15277 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neetu Kumari And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Anjali Upadhya,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for State respondents and Ms Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for Greater Noida. 2. Petitioners raise a grievance with respect to allotment of vending zone. Petitioners have been operating business at vending zone situated in District Greater Noida and claim their rights in respect of the said vending zone. Factual disputes being involved, matter may be more appropriately looked into by the Grievance Redressal Committee at district level constituted by the Noida Authority. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with the observation, in case petitioners approach the Grievance Redressal Committee within a period of two weeks from today along with a copy of this order, that grievance may be addressed in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months therefrom. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Jaideep/- Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad