Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5739 (UTT)

SAMD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/780/2021 · 2025-01-09

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:380 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UWPCRL/780/2021 Mr. Ravi Bisht, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Bora, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. J.P. Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners makes statement at the Bar that in view of subsequent development, the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 09.01.2025 Mahinder