Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57379 (KAR)

SMT V LALITHAMMA v. THE CHIEF MANAGER DHFL, VYSYA HOUSING FINANCE LTD.,

RFA/1260/2025 · 2025-09-26

K S Hemalekha

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39054 RFA No. 1260 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1260 OF 2025 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. V. LALITHAMMA W/O.LATE T.S.PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/AT NO.527/B 4TH ‘A’ CROSS, 12TH 'A' MAIN OPP. RAJIV GANDHI PARK, 'W' SECTOR YELAHANKA NEW TOWN BENGALURU-560 064. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ARVIND C. DESAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF MANAGER DHFL, VYSYA HOUSING FINANCE LTD., NO.284, 2ND FLOOR B/W : 17TH AND 18TH CROSS SAMPIGE ROAD MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560 003. 2. SMT. SEEMA W/O. LATE MOHAN BABU D/O. P.KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT NO.39, 1ST 'E' MAIN DR. RAJENDRAPRASAD ROAD GIRINAGAR BENGALURU-560 085. Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39054 RFA No. 1260 of 2025 3. SMT. P. SUCHITHRA W/O. SRI. SURESH D/O. LATE PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO.15, 1ST MAIN ROAD 12TH CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR YELAHANKA BANGALORE-560 064. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.10.2024 PASSED IN OS.NO.116/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE LIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT Memo is filed by the learned counsel for the appellant which is duly signed by the appellant, which reads as under: “That the appellant above named begs submit as fallows:- That the above named appellant had filed the above appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.116/2016, and the appellant and respondent No.2 have amicably settled their family dispute in O.S. No.8890/2013 filed by the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39054 RFA No. 1260 of 2025 respondent No.2 before the Hon'ble City Civil Judge, Bangalore (CCH-31) and both the parties have filed the compromise petition and the said petition was accepted by the Hon'ble City Civil Judge (CCH-31) on 18.09.2025. Therefore, the appellant is not intending to prosecute the above appeal any further against the respondents. WHEREFORE, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity”. 2. Memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18