SRI SAI DURGA HOUSING ESTATES v. THE ANDHRA PRADESH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
WP/25885/2025 · 2025-10-09
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57376 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57376 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010494822025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 25885/2025 Between:
1. SRI SAI DURGA HOUSING ESTATES, (BRUNDAVANAM ADVAITHA), REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, REGISTERED PROJECT WITH AP RERA VIDE P06270040197, H.NO.12-112, ARAVAPALLI RAJENDRA PRASAD STREET, OPP. D-MART, ENIKEPADU, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SRI ATIURI SUDHIR, S/O LATE SITHA RAMASWAMY, AGE 44 YEARS, OCC MANAGING PARTNER OF SRI SAI DURGA HOUSING ESTATES (BRUNDAVANAM ADVAITHA), R/O H.NO.6-97, SWAMI SADHA, KAVURI STREET, NIDAMANURU, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, REGULATORY AUTHORITY, D.NO.60-5-1, SIDDHARTHA NAGAR, POLYCLINIC ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 2. BANDI PLASI AHALYA JHANSI, W/O KOTHA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA RAO, AGE 70 YRS, R/O D.NO.42-3/1-8/5, SARITHASADAN, GOTTUMUKKALAVARI CROSS ROAD, RAMAKRISHNAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. 2
The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Ms. Aishwarya Nagula, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri A. Ram Dheeraj, learned Standing Counsel for Andhra Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority. 2. Learned Counsel for Writ Petitioners seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition and approach the Appellate Forum to challenge the impugned Order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority dated 30.06.2025 in Complaint No.20/2025. Learned Counsel would also submit that as on the date of filing of the present Writ Petition, the Writ Petitioners were not aware that the Appellate Tribunal had already been constituted. Since it has now come to the knowledge of the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners that the Appellate Tribunal is now functioning, the present Writ Petition is sought to be withdrawn. 3. Having considered these reasons, this Court deems it appropriate to allow the Writ Petitioners to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to approach the Appellate Tribunal. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioners to approach the Appellate Forum within a period of two weeks from the date that this Order is uploaded on the website of this Court. It transpires from record that the impugned Order has been passed on 30.06.2025 and the present Writ Petition is filed on 16.08.2025.
There shall be a direction not to reckon the period from 16.08.2025 up to two weeks from the date of uploading of this Order on the website of this Court. This period shall not be reckoned for the purpose of limitation in filing the Appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 10.10.2025 Vns