Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010077982001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS SECOND APPEAL NO:375 of 2001 Between: B.babu Rao & 2 Others ...APPELLANT AND M Chanti 2 Others ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. VENKATESWARLU POSANI Counsel for the Respondent:
1. V V L N SARMA The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS SECOND APPEAL No.375 of 2001
JUDGMENT:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M.Sobhanadri Naidu,
learned counsel representing Sri Venkateswarlu Posani,
learned counsel for the appellants, submitted that in spite of his best efforts, he could not contact the parties/appellants and thereby, he has no instructions from the appellants.
2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS
Date: 10.10.2025 KNN