23. CAO 977 of 2025.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.977/2025 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) ST. NO.16190/2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.364/2024 (D) Smt. Laxmibai wd/o Gangadhar Narvade and others ...Versus… Union of India, Through General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad (A.P.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mr. D.S. Lambat, Advocate for applicants Ms Neerja Chaubey, Advocate for respondent CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 11/11/2025 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 133 days caused in filing the revision application is condoned. 2. The civil application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) ST. NO.16190/2025 1. The applicants state that there is a typographical error in second line in paragraph No.11(2) of the judgment, dated 03/02/2025. The amount awarded to the appellant No.1 should be Rs.4,80,000/- instead of Rs.5,80,000/-. 2. The learned Advocate for the respondent agrees to the same. 3. Misc. Civil Application is allowed in the following terms :- 2025:BHC-NAG:11826 23. CAO 977 of 2025.odt 2 (i) Delete figure “Rs.5,80,000/-” in second line in paragraph No.11(2) of the judgment, dated 03/02/2025 and substitute the same with figure “Rs.4,80,000/-”. (ii) Corrections be carried out accordingly and corrected order be uploaded on the official website. (ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) Wadkar