Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57367 (KAR)

SRI JAYARAMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/13895/2025 · 2025-11-18

Mohammad Nawaz

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47400 CRL.P No. 13895 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO.13895/2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI JAYARAMA S/O. SRI. NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT. KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 112. 2. SRI. P. KUMARASWAMY S/O. SRI. PUTTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/AT. BOMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, SATHANURU HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 117. 3. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O. SRI. JAYARAMA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT. KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 112. 4. SRI. MANJESH S/O. SRI. KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT. KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE, Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47400 CRL.P No. 13895 of 2025 HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 112. 5. SMT. SHILPA W/O. SRI. MANJESH, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/AT. KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 112. 6. SMT. PUSHPA @ J PUSHPALATHA D/O. SRI. JAYARAMA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/AT. KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 112. 7. SMT. LEELA W/O. SRI. KUMARA, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, R/AT. KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 112. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GANAPATI BHAT VAJRALLI, ADV.) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA HAROHALLI POLICE STATION, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 117 PRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47400 CRL.P No. 13895 of 2025 2. SRI. RAMAKRISHNA W/O. SRI. KARI GIRIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT. KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 117. 3. SMT. KAMALAMMA W/O SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT. KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 117. 4. SRI. RANGANATHA S/O. SRI. KARIGIRIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT. KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 117. 5. SMT. LEELAVATHI W/O. SRI. RANGANATHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT. KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562117. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL RAI K., HCGP FOR R1 SRI SATHVIK M., ADV. FOR R2) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.403/2017 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 I.E., HAROHALLI P.S., AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES ALLEGED U/S 143, 149, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47400 CRL.P No. 13895 of 2025 323, 324, 504 AND 506 OF IPC, ON THE FILE OF PENDING BEFORE THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KANAKAPURA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, AS PER ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ ORAL ORDER The petitioners are seeking to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.403/2017 pending before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Kanakapura, Ramanagara District. 2. The proceedings are sought to be quashed on the ground that earlier to filing of the complaint by respondent No.2, second petitioner herein had lodged a complaint registered in Crime No.253/2016 in the very same Police Station and the case now registered against the petitioners is a counter blast to the first case. It is also contended that there is a suit pending between the parties in O.S.No.55/2017 before the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Kanakapura and therefore, to wreak vengeance and to - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47400 CRL.P No. 13895 of 2025 give a colour of criminal offense to the civil dispute, the second respondent has come up with a false complaint making baseless allegations against the petitioners. 3. As could be seen from the complaint averments, the petitioners herein are alleged to have picked up quarrel with the second respondent on 09.06.2016 at about 5.30 p.m., abused him and his wife in filthy language and when one Sri.Ranganath tried to intervene, he was assaulted with a brick on his head. Further, the accused are alleged to have dragged one Jayamma and Leelavathy and assaulted them with clubs and threatened with dire consequences, etc. As per FIR, certain persons have sustained injuries in the incident. There is a case registered against Ranganath and others on the same day on a complaint lodged by second petitioner herein. 4. From the averments of the complaint, it cannot be said that there is no prima facie case made out against the petitioners. There are specific allegations. Further, the - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47400 CRL.P No. 13895 of 2025 statements of the witnesses are also recorded during investigation. It is submitted by the learned HCGP that the charges are already framed in this case and the matter is set down for trial. It is also relevant to mention that in respect of the complaint lodged by the second petitioner herein in Crime No.253/2016 of Harohalli Police Station, charge sheet is already filed and the said case is also pending for trial. 5. There are no grounds to quash the proceedings. The petition is dismissed. Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10