IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.25922 of 2025 Pramila Roul …. Petitioner Mr. Swapnil Roy, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa & another …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No.01 ORDER 24.09.2025 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition and issue Rule "NISI" to the Opp. Parties to show came as to; (i) Why the action of the Opposite Parties in not regularizing the services of the petitioner's husband in the facts and circumstances of the case will not be declared as illegal; and (ii) Why the Opposite Parties will not be directed to regularize the services of the p. 2 p. 2 petitioner's husband within a stipulated time; and (iii) Why the Opposite Parties will not be directed to sanction pension, family pension and other pensionary benefits as due and admissible under the OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 in favour of the petitioner on such regularization of the services of the petitioner's husband within a stipulated time; And if the Opposite Parties do not show cause, then the Rule be made absolute by issuing appropriate writ/writs and any other order as deem fit be passed; And for this act of kindness, petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray. 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-9 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-9 and take a decision in accordance with law within a period of three (3) p. 3 p. 3 months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja PrasannaSatapathy) Judge Sangita/Sisir Designation: Personal Assistant