APHC010535272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. SUNEETHA KAKARLA CHANDRA, W/o. Devanand Annareddy, Aged about 43 years, Residing at Door No. 18 Tirupathi, Tirupathi District, Andhra Pradesh. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Village, Amaravathi. 2. The Director General of Police, AP Police Head Quarters, Mangalagiri, Amaravathi. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District, Tirupath 4. The Station House Officer, Tirupathi Rural Police Station, Tirupati, Tirupathi District. 5. K Maheswar Naidu, S/o. K.Dasaradha Naidu, Residing at Kamma Kandriga, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupathi District. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27646 OF 2025 1. SUNEETHA KAKARLA CHANDRA, W/o. Devanand Annareddy, Aged about 43 years, Residing at Door No. 18-1-93/1, Yashoda Nagar, KT Road, Tirupathi, Tirupathi District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Village, Amaravathi. 2. The Director General of Police, AP Police Head Quarters, Mangalagiri, 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District, Tirupathi. 4. The Station House Officer, Tirupathi Rural Police Station, Tirupati, 5. K Maheswar Naidu, S/o. K.Dasaradha Naidu, Residing at Kamma Kandriga, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupathi District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. SUNEETHA KAKARLA CHANDRA, W/o. Devanand Annareddy, Aged 93/1, Yashoda Nagar, KT Road, ...Petitioner Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department 2. The Director General of Police, AP Police Head Quarters, Mangalagiri, 4. The Station House Officer, Tirupathi Rural Police Station, Tirupati, 5. K Maheswar Naidu, S/o. K.Dasaradha Naidu, Residing at Kamma ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to may be pleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the lawful possession of the petitioner over the land upto an extent of 258.75 Sq. yards in Plot No.71 in Sy.No.13, Near Balaji Dairy, Ward No.8, Avilala Village Accounts, No.39, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Tirupati, Tirupathi Registration District, Tirupathi District previously Chittgor District) and by summoning the petitioner to the police station without any formal notice or complaint at the behest of 5th respondent and in coercing the petitioner to act to the tunes of 5th respondent and failing which threatening with dire consequences, implication in false cases is as per se illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of Natural Justice, without power of authority and opposed to the Articles 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioner with respect to the land upto an extent of 258.75 Sq. yards in Plot No.71 in Sy.No.13, Near Balaji Dairy, Ward No.8, Avilala Village Accounts, No.39, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Tirupati, Tirupathi Registration District, Tirupathi District {previously Chittoor District), pending disposal of the writ petition and pass any other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: VMR LEGAL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27646 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…may be pleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the lawful possession of the petitioner over the land upto an extent of 258.75 Sq. yards in Plot No.71 in Sy.No.13, Near Balaji Dairy, Ward No.8, Avilala Village Accounts, No.39, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Tirupati, Tirupathi Registration District, Tirupathi District previously Chittoor District) and by summoning the petitioner to the police station without any formal notice or complaint at the behest of 5th respondent and in coercing the petitioner to act to the tunes of 5th respondent and failing which threatening with dire consequences, implication in false cases is as per se illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of Natural Justice, without power of authority and opposed to the Articles 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and to pass such…” 02. Heard Sri Venakesh B Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the official respondents. 03. The case of the petitioner is that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the above-mentioned land. It is alleged that at the instance of the 5th respondent, the police have been interfering with his possession and summoning him to the police station without there being any formal complaint or registration 4 of crime, thereby harassing him and compelling him to act according to the 5th respondent. 04. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on the other hand, submits that no crime has been registered against the petitioner as on date and that the respondent police have not interfered with the civil dispute or summoned the petitioner to the police station. It is further submitted that the allegations made in the writ petition are unfounded and baseless. 05. Having considered the submissions made by both sides and upon perusal of the material placed on record, the police are not interfering in the matter and that no crime is registered against the petitioner. 06. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent- police are directed not to interfere in a civil dispute between the parties except under due process of Law. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.10.2025 KKV 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27646 of 2025 Dated.09.10.2025 KKV 142