Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57352 (AP)

Shaik Baji Basha, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/21810/2021 · 2025-10-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010358602021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 21810/2021 Between: 1. SHAIK BAJI BASHA, S/O.MASTAN VALI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC.PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O.D.NO.23-3-37, SIVALAYAM DOWN, ATCHAMPETA ROAD, STATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A .P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL DISTRICT, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, E, SATTENAPALLI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SATTENAPALLI TOWN POLICE STATION, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. 5 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PIDUGURALLA POLICE STATION,PIDUGURALLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. 6 JUJJURI PULLA RAO, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. FINANCE BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.16-594/1, BESIDE ANJ REDDY HOSPITALI, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT.CELL NO.9963912469 7. 7 JUJJURI MAHESH, S/O.PULLA RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC.FINANCE BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.16-594/1, BESIDE ANJ REDDY HOSPITALI, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT.CELL NO.9989876579 8. 8 KOTTAMASU RAMAKRISHNA, , S/O. PERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC.FINANCE BUSINESS, R/O.NEAR ANKALAMMA TEMPLE, KARAMPUDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.CELL NO.9248074734 9. 9 ATHMAKURI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O.PUNNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC.FINANCE BUSINESS, R/O.SRI NILAYAM APARTMENTS, MACHERLA ROAD, KARAMPUDI VILLAGE AND 2 MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.9949712041 10. 10 V VEERANJANEYULU, S/O.RAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. FINANCE BUSINESS, R/O.SRI NILAYAM APARTMENTS, MACHERLA ROAD, KARAMPUDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL,GUNTUR DISTRICT.9885159600. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 5 in interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and his members at the behest and influence of the Respondents 6 to 10 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interefere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK MEERAVALI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “....to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 5 in interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and his members at the behest and influence of the Respondents 6 to 10 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent/State. Perused the material on record. Learned Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that respondent Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties and police never called the Petitioner to the Police Station and would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 21810 of 2021 09.10.2025 Mjl /*