Yakkala Venkata Sridhar Pullarao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/10422/2025 · 2025-10-08
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57348 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57348 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 APHC010534632025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10422/2025 Between:
1. YAKKALA VENKATA SRIDHAR PULLARAO, S/O.
VENKATASUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. OLD MARKET BAZAR, VINUKONDA TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT.
2. SURA VENKATESWARA RAO ALIAS VENKAT, S/O. LATE PULLAIAH.
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. MALLIKARJUNAPETA, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Amaravathi.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. RAJA REDDY KONETI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court Made the Following Order:
The instant petition under Section 528 of the BNSS has been filed, by the petitioners/A1 and A2, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in C.C.No.280 of 2024 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vinukonda, for the offences under Sections 417, 420 IPC and Section 7(1), 7(2) and 20(2) of the COTPA.
2. Heard Sri Raja Reddy Koneti,
learned counsel for the Petitioners/Accused and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners and acceded to, by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor that the subject matter of this
2 Criminal Petition is squarely covered by the common order passed by this Court in Criminal Petition Nos.5421 of 2019 and batch, dated 18.12.2019 and also the order dated 20.06.2025 in Crl.P.No.6056 of 2025 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court.
4. For ready reference the order passed in Criminal Petition Nos.5421 of 2019 and batch, dated 18.12.2019 wherein this Court held as follows:
“But as far as the present cases are concerned, this Court by exercising the power under section 482 Cr.P.C and following the mandate of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in State of Haryana v. Bhajan lal and the
judgment of the High Court of Allahabad in M/s.Pepsico India Holdings(Pvt) Ltd., and Another (4 supra), is constrained to hold that all the FIRs/cases that have been registered under the provisions of the IPC, FSS Act and the COTPA Act are quashed, leaving it open to them, if they so desire to pursue the prosecution in respect of the offences under the other enactments, if any. The offences under the NDPS Act can be pursued. The offences under the COTPA Act, can only be launched if the police find that the sections 5, 6 7 and 10 are not complied with. Except on these very limited grounds genuine/legitimate traders cannot be prosecuted. It is hoped that copies of the orders passed by the learned single Judge in Crl.P.No.3731 of 2018 and batch and this order are widely circulated by the Director General of Police and the Chief Secretary of the State of Andhra Pradesh through out the state of Andhra Pradesh so that the time and effort of the police are devoted to more serious crimes. Whatever be the impact of tobacco products on the health of an individual or the nation; till the law is amended/modified it has to be followed. As held by many Courts earlier; it may be hard, but it is the law. With the above observations, the criminal petitions are allowed.”
5. Hence, following the said Orders passed by this Court in Criminal Petition Nos.5421 of 2019 and batch, dated 18.12.2019, and taking into
consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this criminal petition is allowed by quashing the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2, in C.C.No.280 of 2024 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vinukonda, for the offences under Sections 417, 420 IPC and
3 Section 7(1), 7(2) and 20(2) of the COTPA. As the offences registered against the petitioners are quashed, the tobacco products in connection with the case shall be returned to the petitioners, on proper identification and under acknowledgement. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date : 09.10.2025 Asr
4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Crl.P.No.10422 of 2025
Dt.09.10.2025
Asr