APHC010286292025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1820/2025 Between: 1. CHOWDARI HALEEMA SADIYA,, W/O LATE CHOWDARI ABDUL WAHEED, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O OPPOSITE MOTI MASJID, KURNOOL CITY, NOW RESIDING AT D.NO. 15/280, NOORANI MASJID STREET, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. K PRABHAKAR REDDY, S/O NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O D.N0.7/347-12A, SIMHAPURI COLONY, KADAPA MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. KALLUR CHAPPAL REDDY, S/O YELLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O D.NO.2/474, BELDARI STREET, NAGARAJUPETA, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. BASIREDDY RAMAIAHGARI VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, S/O RAMAIAHGARI YERRAPU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS, R/O D.NO.2/474, BELDARI STREET, NAGARAJUPETA, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe above-named Petitioner prefers to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition against the Order dt.01-07-2024 passed in E.A.No. 2 125/2023 in E.A.No. 120/2017 in E.P.No.24/2015 in O.S.No.37/2024 on the file of Honble VI Additional District Judge, Kadapa, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant STAY of all further proceedings in E.P.No.24/2015 in O.S.No.37/2024 on the file of Hon'ble VI Additional District Judge, Kadapa, Y.S.R. Kadapa District during pendency of this CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1820/2025 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Civil Revision Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Civil Revision Petition. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 09.10.2025 TTPPSS 4 111 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1820/2025 09.10.2025 TTPPSS