APHC010001412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 24 OF 2025 Between: 1. KONA APPA RAO, S/O.Late K.Polipilli, Aged 57 Years, Junior Assistant (Now Dismissed from Service) O/O.GVMC, Visakhapatnam , R/O.Visakhapatna District. 1. SRI KUNAPA REDDY, Kanna Babu, IAS The Principal Secretary, MA and UD Department, State Of Andhra Pradesh Amravati, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. Dr Pommala Sampath Kumar IAS, The Commissioner Of Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. 3. Sri S Suresh Kumar IAS, MA and UD Department State of Andhra Prade Amaravati Velagapudi Guntur District R3 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 17 03 2025 vide I A No 1 of 2025 in C C No 24 of 2025 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances sta be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of contempt Court Act, 1971 for willful and deliberate disobedience of IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 24 OF 2025 APPA RAO, S/O.Late K.Polipilli, Aged 57 Years, Junior Assistant (Now Dismissed from Service) O/O.GVMC, Visakhapatnam , ...Petitioner AND 1. SRI KUNAPA REDDY, Kanna Babu, IAS The Principal Secretary, MA and ate Of Andhra Pradesh Amravati, Velagapudi, Guntur 2. Dr Pommala Sampath Kumar IAS, The Commissioner Of Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. 3. Sri S Suresh Kumar IAS, MA and UD Department State of Andhra Prade Amaravati Velagapudi Guntur District R3 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 17 03 2025 vide I A No 1 of 2025 in C C No 24 of 2025 ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of contempt Court Act, 1971 for willful and deliberate disobedience of IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA APPA RAO, S/O.Late K.Polipilli, Aged 57 Years, Junior Assistant (Now Dismissed from Service) O/O.GVMC, Visakhapatnam , ...Petitioner 1. SRI KUNAPA REDDY, Kanna Babu, IAS The Principal Secretary, MA and ate Of Andhra Pradesh Amravati, Velagapudi, Guntur 2. Dr Pommala Sampath Kumar IAS, The Commissioner Of Greater 3. Sri S Suresh Kumar IAS, MA and UD Department State of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati Velagapudi Guntur District R3 is impleaded as per Court Order ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying ted in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of contempt Court Act, 1971 for willful and deliberate disobedience of the order in WP No.16011/2019 dated 02.04.2024 passed by the Honorable Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa in the interest on Justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioner to implead the Proposed Respondent Nos.3 as Respondent Nos.3 in CC.No.24 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: K R SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA Counsel for the Respondents:A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 24 OF 2025 ORDER: This contempt case has been filed by the petitioner due to the non- compliance of the orders dated 02.04.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16011 of 2019. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the orders dated 02.04.2024 passed this Court in W.P.No. 16011 of 2019 has been complied by the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no intention on the part of the respondents to disobey the order of this Court they have done their efforts for compliance of the orders as expeditiously as possible and prays to close the contempt case. 4. Recording the submission made, this Contempt Case is closed, since the order has been complied by the respondents, the question of contempt does not arise. There shall be no orders as costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.10.2025 KKV