CRR(F)-55-2017 IN THE 201 Subhash Chander State of Haryana CORAM : HON Present: Non Mr. Mr. Ms. for *** NAMIT KUMA 1. The dated 22.11.2016 whereby the app Section 125 Cr. 2. Lear per his instruct respondents No. petition has been 3. Ther 2017 (O&M) -1- THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRR(F)- Date of De hander Versus ryana and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT None for the petitioner. Mr. Amrik Narwal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Girotra, Advocate and Ms. Nirmala Jangra, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5. *** UMAR, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has filed the instant re 1.2016 passed by the learned Distric he application preferred by the resp 5 Cr.P.C. has been allowed. earned counsel appearing for respo nstructions, the matter was settled ts No.2 to 5 and they were living s been rendered infructuous. There is no representation for the pe NJAB AND HARYANA AT ARH -55-2017 (O&M) e of Decision:17.02.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondents AMIT KUMAR ryana. and stant revision petition against the order District Judge, Family Court, Rohtak e respondents for maintenance under r respondents No.2 to 5 submits that settled between the petitioner and living together, therefore, the instan the petitioner. s e order Rohtak under that as r and instant PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.02.18 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh CRR(F)-55-2017 4. The however, liberty any claim still su 5. A co 6. Pe February 17, 20 Pankaj* 2017 (O&M) -2- The instant petition is dismissed iberty is granted to the petitioner to re survives. A copy of this order be sent to the nding application(s), if any, also , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable issed as having become infructuous to revive the instant petition in case the petitioner for information. o stand(s) disposed of. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE ned : Yes/No : Yes/No ctuous, in case PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.02.18 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh