Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57335 (CHH)

SMT. BABITA PATEL v. LAKHAN LAL PATEL

MCC/1265/2025 · 2025-12-16

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:61439 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1265 of 2025 1 - Smt. Babita Patel W/o Lakhan Patel Aged About 31 Years D/o Niranjan Patel, Occupation Unemployed, R/o Village Putkapuri, Tahsil Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus 1 - Lakhan Lal Patel S/o Onkar Patel Aged About 41 Years (Wrongly Mention In Order Sheet As Lakhan Patel), Occupation- Station House Officer, R/o Madhuban Para, Modipara, Raigarh, Tashil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, Presently R/o S.H.O., Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent (Cause title as taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : None. For Respondent : Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 17/12/2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. Vide PUD dated 14.11.2025, Judge, Family Court, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) has sought further extension of time to RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.12.17 17:01:34 +0530 2 dispose of Civil Suit No. HMA/1180/2024 newly registered as Civil Suit No. 140-A/2025 (Lakhan Lal Patel vs. Smt. Babita Patel) after transferred from Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) which was directed to dispose of preferably within period of four months from the date of receipt of the record from the transferring Court vide order dated 17.06.2025 passed in TPC No.41/2025 (Smt. Babita Patel vs. Lakhan Lal Patel) by this Court. 3. Considering the reasons mentioned in the request letter, further time of four months from today i.e. 17.12.2025 is granted with regard to disposal of the case mentioned herein above. It is further directed to the concerned Family Court not to extend hearing on casual manner. Further, if the case is not decided within aforesaid period and further time is sought, then copy of all the order-sheets are to be sent along with extension application. 4. Accordingly, this MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi