1 2025:CGHC:61306 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8306 of 2023 1 - Naresh Kumar Jaiswal S/o Shri Janak Ram Jaiswal Aged About 30 Years Occupation Contingency Fund Servant, Post Metric Tribal Boys Hostel, Kharsiya, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Prabhat Patel S/o Suraj Pal Patel Aged About 30 Years Occupation Servant, Pre Metric Tribal Boys Hostel, Sondka, Ps, Po And Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Tribal And Scheduled Caste, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - The Assisstant Commissioner Tribal Development, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Ghritlahre, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 16/12/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1. That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus/certiorari or of a like nature to quash the advertisement dated 14/07/2023 (ANNEXURE-P/1) to the extent of the eligibility criteria to allow only the employees of the department posted as Assistant Grade-2, Assistant Grade-3 or Hostel Superintendents only as mentioned in the main part of the advertisement as well as the para no. 2(2)(1) of the Schedule-A. 10.2. That, a command/direction may kindly be issued to the respondents to include the existing employees posted in the department as class-4 to appear and participate in the departmental examination to the post of circle organiser. 10.3. That, a command / direction may kindly be issued to the respondents to grant any other relief, as may be 3 deemed fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case, including the cost of the petition. 10.4. That, a command/direction may kindly be issued to the respondents to decide the representation submitted by the petitioners within a stipulated period by speaking order.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat