Bommula Vishnu Kumari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/13214/2021 · 2025-10-08
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57328 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57328 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010231622021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13214/2021 Between:
1. BOMMULA VISHNU KUMAR, D/O. B. VEERA VENKATA SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT. 19 YEARS, OCC.NIL, R/O. 3-45, KALYANA GANAPATHI TEMPLE STREET, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, MUGGAULLA, EAST GODAVARI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. CHIDIPI VENKATESH,, S/O. VENKATRAO, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, OCC. PVT EMPLOYEE, R/O. 2-117, KOTHA MAYEM PETA, CHINAKONDEPUDI VILLAGE, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY.ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI.
2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PS-SEETHANAGARAM, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. BOMMULA MANGATAYARU, W/O. B. VEERA VENKATA SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT.33 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. 3-45, KALYANA GANAPATHI TEMPLE STREET, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, MUGGAULLA, EAST GODAVARI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. BOMMULA VEERA VENKATA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.B. RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT. 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, RIO. 3-45, KALYANA GANAPATHI TEMPLE STREET, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, MUGGAULLA, EAST GODAVARI, ANDHRA PRADESH
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. M/s INNATE LAW ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 2nd respondent in providing police protection to the petitioners life from the respondents No.3 and 4 and their supporters is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to provide Police protection to the petitioners life from the respondents No.3 and 4 and their supporters.”
2. None represented for the Petitioners.
3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.10.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.13214 of 2021
Dt.09.10.2025
Dinesh