Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57326 (KAR)

SRI B SADASHIVAM v. SMT INDRANI

CRP/207/2022 · 2025-11-18

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47703 CRP No. 207 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 207 OF 2022 (SC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI B SADASHIVAM S/O LATE BALASUNDARAM MUDALIAR AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS 2. SMT SARASWATHI W/O LATE B JAGANNATHAN AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS REPRESENTED BY HER SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI B SADASHIVAM-PETITIONER NO.1 BOTH ARE R/AT NO.1/3 (OLD NO.17) 3RD CROSS, SAI BABA NAGAR SRIRAMPURAM, PRESENTLY CALLED AS RAMACHANDRAPURA BENGALURU- 560 021. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. J. R. MOHAN., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT INDRANI D/O LATE M KESHAVALU NAIDU, W/O LATE K PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47703 CRP No. 207 of 2022 2. SRI K JAISHANKAR S/O LATE M KESHAVALU NAIDU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.17, 4TH CROSS SAI BABA NAGAR, SRIRAMPURAM BENGALURU- 560 021. BOTH ARE ALSO AVAILABLE AT: "INDRAVATHI STORES" NO.1/3 (OLD NO.17) 3RD CROSS, SAI BABA NAGAR SRIRAMPURAM, PRESENTLY CALLED AS RAMACHANDRAPURA BENGALURU- 560 021. …RESPONDENTS (R1 & R2 - served and unrepresented) THIS CRP FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSES COURTS ACT 1964 R/W SEC.115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.12.2021 PASSED IN S.C.NO.138/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47703 CRP No. 207 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 18.11.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition. Memo reads as under: "That the dispute between the petitioner and the Respondents has settled out of Court, and the Respondents have handed over the actual physical possession of the schedule premises to the petitioner along with keys. In view of the same, the petitioner may kindly be permitted to withdraw the above petition, in the interest of justice". 2. Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE DH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 38