Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57320 (PNJ)

BALJIT SINGH v. SOHANJIT SINGH AND ANR

CR/2911/2025 · 2025-07-07

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM-10959-CII-2025 IN/& CR-2911-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CM-10959-CII-2025 IN/& CR-2911-2025 Date of decision : 07.07.2025 Baljit Singh ... Petitioner Versus Sohanjit Singh and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.G.C.Dhuriwala, Advocate for the petitioner. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) CM-10959-CII-2025 1. This is an application under Section 151 CPC for revival of the revision petition which was disposed of vide order dated 14.05.2025. 2. For the reasons stated in the application which is supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and the order dated 14.05.2025 is recalled and the main petition is ordered to be restored to its original number. CR-2911-2025 1. This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 23.04.2025 Davinder Kumar 2025.07.07 17:01 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CM-10959-CII-2025 IN/& CR-2911-2025 2 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Executing Court and the impugned order dated 07.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) passed in the appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time and after seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present revision petition. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 07, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Davinder Kumar 2025.07.07 17:01 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment