1 APHC010088602020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 556/2020 Between: 1. GEDELA SUDHARANI,, W/O. RAMA RAO, HINDU, AGED 34 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.37-10-97, MURALINAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. VANJUVAJULA APPANNADORA, S/O.. PENTANNADORA, HINDU, AGED 73 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF VALABU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. VANJUVAJULA BHEEMANNADORA, S/O. PENTANNADORA, HINDU, AGED 63 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF VALABU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. SIRAGAM LAKSHMANNADORA, S/O. AMMATHALLIDORA, HINDU, AGED 61 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF MULAGADA COLONY, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. MAJJI PUNYA SEELADEVI, W/O. SAMARAO, HINDU, 2 AGED 36 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RESIDENT OF STEEL PLANT TOWNSHIP QUARTERS, UKKUNAGARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. SIRAGAM LAKSHMI, D/ O. LAKSHMANNADORA, HINDU, AGED 32 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MULAGADA COLONY, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. SIRAGARP PADMAVATHI, D/O. LAKSHMANNADORA, HINDU, AGED 30 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MULAGADA COLONY, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 7. TEDA ATCHIBABU, S/0. LATE APPALASWAMY, HINDU, AGED 41 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF VALABU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. TEDA PYDITHALLI, S/O. LATE GANGULU, HINDU, AGED 36 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF VALABU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 9. TEDA NARASAYYAMA, W/O. SIMHACHALAM, HINDU, AGED 46 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF SAMMEDA VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 10. JAKEERU DEMUDAMMA, W/O. SATYAM, HINDU, AGED 40 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.37- 10-97, MURALINAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 11. PODELA JAGANNADHAMDORA, S/O. SIMHACHALAM, HINDU, AGED 61 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF VALABU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 12. PODELA KRISHNA, S/O. SURIDEMUDU, HINDU, AGED 48 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF VALABU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.R.7 TO R.12 ARE THE PROFORMA PARTIES. 3 (NO RELIEF IS CLAIMED AGAINST R.7 TO R.12 IN THE PRESENT CRP) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of C.R.P. under Section 115 of C.P.C. being aggrieved by the Order and Decreetal Order dated 27-01-2020 passed in I.A. No.7 of 2020 in O.S. No.57 of 2013 on the file of Hon'ble Court of Senior Civil Judge at Chodavaram, Visakhapatnam District IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to STAY of all further proceedings in O.S. No.57 of 2013 on the file of Senior Civil Judge at Chodgyaram, Visakhapatnam District pending disposal of the C.R.P Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NH AKBAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: When the matter was listed on 14.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. As such, the matter was posted to 19.09.2025. Even on 19.09.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. As such, the matter was directed to be posted on 09.10.2025, under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in the present case. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous applications pending, if any in the Revision Petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Date: 09.10.2025. GSS 5 91 HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V. SUJATHA W.P. No.16583 of 2017 Date: 21.02.2023 GSS