APHC010050302020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 2960/2020 Between: YENDRA SUBBA RAO,, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.3-2/2, KOMODAVOLU VILLAGE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. 3. THE DUPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, STADIUM ROAD, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ELURU RURAL, WEST GODAVARI DIST. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ELURU RURAL STATION, WEST GODAVARI DIST. 6. IRADALA MUDDU KRISHNA, S/O JANARDHANA RAO HINDU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, AGRAHARAM, I TOWN, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. 7. IRADALA VIHARI, S/O MUDDU KRISHNA, HINDU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, AGRAHARAM, I TOWN, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. WEST GODAVARI DIST. 8. PANDI BHASKAR RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, ANURADHA TIMBER DEPO, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. 9. KALA TULASI RAJU, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, KONANGI VILLAGE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SRINIVASULA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2 2. B SOMASEKHAR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take action on the complaint submitted by the petitioner on 01-02-2020 forthwith by registering the FIR against the respondents 6 to 9. Non registration of FIR against the respondents are illegal, void, arbitrary and violation of Article-21 of Constitution of India and also Section-154 of Code of Criminal Procedure in the interest of justice.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that no crime has been registered based on the complaint given by the Petitioner since the dispute between the Petitioner and the Unofficial Respondents is purely civil in nature and the Police advised the Petitioner to seek the redressal before competent Court of Law. 3. Sri V.Srinivasula Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2960 of 2020 Dt.07.08.2025 Dinesh