RAGHVENDRA SINGH @ MANU BHAIYA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
WPIL/1176/2025 · 2025-05-20
Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57318 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57318 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:85117-DB
Court No. - 21 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1176 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raghvendra Singh @ Manu Bhaiya Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Archit Mandhyan,C.S.C.,Lakshmi Kant Mishra Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. Though the petition is ostensibly filed in public interest, the petitioner has not made due disclosure as required by sub-rule (3- A) of Rule 1 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 which was amended in view of the judgement of the Supreme Court in State of Uttaranchal vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal and others, reported in 2010, AIR SCW 1029.
3. Hence, we decline to entertain the petition since we are not satisfied in regard to the bona fides and credentials of the petitioner.
4. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition after making required disclosures, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Mukesh Kr. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad