Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57313 (AP)

L.Srinivasulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/10374/2021 · 2025-10-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010185112021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10374/2021 Between: 1. L.SRINIVASULU, S/O NAGANNA, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC FARMER R/O KOCHERUVU VILLAGE, MANDAL DHONE, DISTRICT KURNOOL. ( A.P) ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, BEING REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL 518222. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , DHONE, KURNOOL 518222. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , DHONE P.S., KURNOOL 518222 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DHONE P.S., KURNOOL 518222. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGESWARA RAO TURAGA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10374 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ or direction or order more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in registration of First Information Report as per the petitioner's complaint in writing dated 27-04-2021 is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, since the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence, as arbitrary, illegal, unjustified, disrespect towards procedural criminal law and Violative articles 14 and 300(A) of constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to register the First Information Report as per the petitioner's complaint in writing dated 27-04-2021, for onward investigation, forthwith…” 2. None represented on behalf of the Petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the Writ Petition. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution. No order as to Costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.10.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 10374 of 2021 Dated.09.10.2025 UPS 152