APHC010497972025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. Reddy Tata, s/o Late Surayya aged about 65 years Occ Agriculture, R/o Kapu -street G.Sigadam village G.Sigadam Mandal Srikakulam District 1. The state of Andhra Pradesh, Rep, by its principal secretary Home secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravati Guntur district. 2. The Superindendent of Police, Srikakulam Srikakulam District 3. The Station House Officer, JR Puram Police Station, Ranasthalam mandal Srikakulam District 4. The SubInspector of Police, G.Sigada 5. Mahadevu Sarita, The Tahsildar, G.Sigadam mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 6. L Santa Raam, Mandal Surveyor, MRO Office G.Sigadam mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 7. Mylapalli Srinivasa rao, . Principal Govt. and mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27551 OF 2025 1. Reddy Tata, s/o Late Surayya aged about 65 years Occ Agriculture, R/o street G.Sigadam village G.Sigadam Mandal Srikakulam District ...Petitioner AND 1. The state of Andhra Pradesh, Rep, by its principal secretary Home secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravati Guntur district. 2. The Superindendent of Police, Srikakulam Srikakulam District 3. The Station House Officer, JR Puram Police Station, Ranasthalam mandal 4. The SubInspector of Police, G.Sigadam Police Station Srikakulam District 5. Mahadevu Sarita, The Tahsildar, G.Sigadam mandal, Srikakulam District 6. L Santa Raam, Mandal Surveyor, MRO Office G.Sigadam mandal, 7. Mylapalli Srinivasa rao, . Principal Govt. Jr College, G.Sigadam Village and mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Reddy Tata, s/o Late Surayya aged about 65 years Occ Agriculture, R/o street G.Sigadam village G.Sigadam Mandal Srikakulam District ...Petitioner 1. The state of Andhra Pradesh, Rep, by its principal secretary Home dept, 3. The Station House Officer, JR Puram Police Station, Ranasthalam mandal m Police Station Srikakulam District 5. Mahadevu Sarita, The Tahsildar, G.Sigadam mandal, Srikakulam District 6. L Santa Raam, Mandal Surveyor, MRO Office G.Sigadam mandal, Jr College, G.Sigadam Village 2 8. Penumajji Kannam Naidu, s/o Somu naidu Aged about 40 years, Occ out- sourcing employee, BC colony, G.Sigadam Village 85 mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 9. Panumajji Devanand, s/o Somu naidu Aged about 37 years, Occ Line man, BC colony, G.Sigadam Village Sc mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 10. Penumajji Hari, s/o Somu naidu Aged about 34 years, Occ un-employee, BC colony, G.Sigadam Village and mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 11. Mahadahyam Narayana rao, s/o Late jagganatha rao Aged about 65 years, Occ Ex-Sarpanch, Balija Street, G.Sigadam Village and mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 12. Revalli paidi raju, s/o tati naidu Aged about 30 years, Occ tractor driver Kella street, G.Sigadam Village Sc mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 13. Meesala mohan rao, s/o paidi talli Aged about 35 years, Occ out- sourcing employee, Sairam colony, G.Sigadam Village and mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 14. Penumajji Appala Naidu, s/o Late adayya Aged about 63 years, Occ agriculture, BC colony, G.Sigadam Village and mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 15. Penumajji Suryanarayana, s/o Late Raji naidu Aged about 42 years, Occ agriculture labourer, BC colony, G.Sigadam Village and mandal, Srikakulam District 532148 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or orders or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the Respondents no.2 to 4 to register the crime against the 3 respondent no. 5 to 15 on petitioner complaint dt.01.09.2025 is highly illegal arbitrary violation of Articles 14,21 and 300 (A) of the Constitution of India and also violation of the principles of natural justice consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to register the crime against the respondent no. 5 to 15 on petitioner complaint dt.01.09.2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to register the crime against the respondent no. 5 to 15 on petitioner complaint dt.01.09.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO.27551 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or orders or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the Respondents Nos.2 to 4 to register the crime against the respondent no. 5 to 15 on petitioner complaint dt.01.09.2025 is highly illegal arbitrary violation of Articles 14,21 and 300 (A) of the Constitution of India and also violation of the principles of natural justice consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to register the crime against the respondent no. 5 to 15 on petitioner complaint dt.01.09.2025 and pass...” 2. Heard Sri T.Tejeswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner lodged a complaint dated 01.09.2025 before the police authorities seeking registration of a case against the unofficial respondents, but despite lapse of time, no FIR has been registered. 4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that the police have received the petitioner’s complaint, conducted a preliminary enquiry, and found that no cognizable offence is made out, and 5 that the allegations are false and civil in nature, therefore, no case was registered. 5. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of, however, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.10.2025 KKV 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 198 W.P.No.27551 of 2025 Date: 09.10.2025 KKV