SHREE SAI ABHIYANTA BEROJGAR SEWA SAHAKARI SANSTHA,THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT,ABHIJIT SUBHASH NAMPALLIWA v. THE COLLECTOR, NAGPUR AND 3 OTHERS
WP/193/2018 · 2025-07-01
Shri Nitin W Sambre, Shri Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57301 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57301 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
3 wp 193-2018.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 193/2018
Shri Sai Abhiyanta Berojgar Sewa Sahakari Sanstha, through its President Abhijit Subhash Nampalliwa Vs. The Collector, Nagpur and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri Prakhar Upadhyay, Advocate h/f Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.M. Ghodeswar, AGP for respondent No.1 Ms Radhika G. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.5 CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE AND SACHIN.S. DESHMUKH, JJ.. DATE : 01.07.2025 On 16.01.2018, this Court has issued notice and observed that the contract award shall be subject to outcome of the petition. 2. On 18.06.2025, this Court ordered last chance in the matter. 3. Today, when the matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner. 4. The prayer in the petition is for issuance of directions to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to allocate work and issue fresh work order in favour of the petitioner for E- tender dated 14.06.2017. A further request is made to quash and set aside the E-tender dated 12.12.2017 being
3 wp 193-2018.odt 2 illegal, void ab initio and arbitrary. 5.
At this stage, learned Counsel appearing for petitioner, on instructions, states that since subject matter has rendered infructuous, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) (N.W. SAMBRE, J.) R.S. Sahare