REKHA PATIL W/O SANTOSHPATIL v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WPHC/100010/2025 · 2025-06-19
K V Aravind, R Devdas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5730 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5730 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7792-DB WPHC No.100010 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND WPHC NO.100010 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
REKHA PATIL W/O SANTOSH PATIL AGE. 23 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. SAVASUDDI VILLAGE 591235, RAIBAG TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJASHEKHAR BURJI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BELAGAVI DISTRICT, BELAGAVI-590001.
2.
POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR, RAIBAG POLICE STATION, RAIBAG-591317, RAIBAG TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRCT.
3.
SHIVAGOUDA BASAGOUDA PATIL AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O.BASTAWAD, RAIBAG TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT.
4.
BHARATESH KOLI AGE. 30 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O. BASTAWAD, RAIBAG TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. MAHANTESH R. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4)
THIS WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS WRIT PETITION AND ISSUE A WRIT OF HABEAS-CORPUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION TO, DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE TO PRODUCE SRI. SANTOSH PATIL, ADVOCATE BEFORE THIS HON’BLE COURT & ETC.
MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.06.24 10:07:47 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7792-DB WPHC No.100010 of 2025
THIS WPHC, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS)
In terms of the directions issued by this court on the previous occasion, the Superintendent of Police, Belagavi has filed a status report, which we have perused.
2. Prima facie, we find that the Police Inspector, Raibag Police Station has taken over the investigation which was earlier done by the Sub-Inspector of Police of the same police station. Thereafter, several materials have been collected and the accused persons have been identified and the Investigating Officer has proceeded to record the statements of all the witnesses and the accused persons have been arrested. In such a scenario, where the initial investigation has found that it may be a case of supari killing and the persons named in the complaint are said to have given supari to other persons who have
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7792-DB WPHC No.100010 of 2025
carried out killing, we are satisfied that the investigation has proceeded reasonably well.
3. At this juncture, we do not want to consider the submission made on behalf of the petitioner regarding change of the Investigating Officer. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to move appropriate application and seek change of the Investigating Officer, if so necessary. With this, the writ petition (habeas corpus) stands
disposed of.
Sd/- (R.DEVDAS) JUDGE
Sd/- (K V ARAVIND) JUDGE
MBS CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 5