Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57297 (KAR)

M/S LISA APPARELS PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

MFA/1524/2019 · 2025-12-02

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50237 MFA No. 1524 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1524 OF 2019 (ESI) BETWEEN: M/S. LISA APPARELS PRIVATE LIMITED 83/4/10, DODDAMMA TEMPLE STREET, HULIMAVU, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-76 REPRESENTED BY ITS FORMER MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI. R. SUBRAMANYAM IYER …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ASHOK.B.PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, BANGALORE SOUTH, BOMMASANDRA, NO.23, 9TH B AND C MAIN, B.T.M. RING ROAD, OPP. IOC PETROL BUNK BENGALURU – 560 029 2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, BANGALORE SOUTH, BOMMASANDRA, NO.23, 9TH B AND C MAIN, B.T.M. RING ROAD, OPP. IOC PETROL BUNK BENGALURU – 560 029 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.N. KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50237 MFA No. 1524 of 2019 THIS MFA FILED U/S 82(2) OF ESI ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2018 PASSED IN ESI APPLICATION NO.104/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE COURT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE APPLICANT UNDER SECTION 75 & 76 OF ESI ACT. 1948. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that now the Employees State Corporation has introduced a scheme, namely, Amnesty Scheme, 2025, for settlement of cases filed under Sections 75 and 82 of the Employees State Corporation Act, 1948. Therefore, the appellants seek permission to avail benefit in terms of the said scheme. Hence, the appeal is disposed of with a liberty to avail benefit of the Amnesty Scheme, 2025. 2. In case, if the case is not settled under the Amnesty Scheme, 2025, then the liberty is reserved to challenge the impugned order. SD/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE SRAList No.: 1 Sl No.: 24