107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT SANTOSH KUMAR UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE MR Present Mr. Karnail Singh, Advocate, for the * SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA 1. The present Writ Petition order dated 08.04.2025 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as “the CAT”) seeking appointment to the post of Staff Car Driver Grade basis, challenging the appointments of respondents No. 4 and 5. However, the CAT found this challenge to be baseless and had never applied for the post of Staff Car Driver Grade come on record that the vacancy circular dated application for filling up the post on deputation basis circular dated the Government calling for applicatio said basis, the respondents There is no document in support of the assertion that the posts never notified. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SANTOSH KUMAR V/s. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. Karnail Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) The present Writ Petition preferred by the petitioner order dated 08.04.2025 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as “the CAT”) appointment to the post of Staff Car Driver Grade , challenging the appointments of respondents No. 4 and 5. However, the CAT found this challenge to be baseless and had never applied for the post of Staff Car Driver Grade come on record that the vacancy circular dated application for filling up the post on deputation basis circular dated 24.07.2020 was circulated amongst various department the Government calling for application from said basis, the respondents No.4 and 5 had applied and were appointed. There is no document in support of the assertion that the posts never notified. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14069-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:16thof May, 2025 ..…...Petitioner(s) .....Respondent(s) SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA preferred by the petitioner against order dated 08.04.2025 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as “the CAT”), appointment to the post of Staff Car Driver Grade-III on deputation , challenging the appointments of respondents No. 4 and 5. However, the CAT found this challenge to be baseless and recorded that the petitioner had never applied for the post of Staff Car Driver Grade-III and it has also come on record that the vacancy circular dated 24.07.2019, inviting application for filling up the post on deputation basis, was approved and amongst various departments of from eligible employees. On the had applied and were appointed. There is no document in support of the assertions made by the petitioner Suresh Kumar 2025.05.22 09:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14069-2025 2. The fact interfered unless found to be perverse. 3. In view of the above, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the CAT dated misconceived and the same is accordingly 4. Al accordingly. May 16, 2025 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned Whether Reportable 2025 (O&M) The factual finding arrived at by the CAT would interfered unless found to be perverse. In view of the above, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the CAT dated 08.04.2025 misconceived and the same is accordingly dismissed All pending applications in this [SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA [MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA 2025 Whether speaking / reasoned : Whether Reportable : arrived at by the CAT would not be In view of the above, we do not find any reason to interfere 08.04.2025. The Writ Petition is dismissed. pending applications in this case are disposed of SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA] JUDGE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA] JUDGE : Yes / No : Yes / No Suresh Kumar 2025.05.22 09:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document