Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5729 (UTT)

AZMAT ALI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/785/2021 · 2025-01-08

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:301 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 785 of 2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. 1. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Mr. J.P. Kandal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Petitioner has sought quashing of F.I.R. No. 50 of 2021, registered against him for offences punishable under Sections 495, 323, 506 of I.P.C. in Police Station Doiwala, District Dehradun. 4. The impugned F.I.R. is on record as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition. Perusal of FIR reveals that specific allegations have been made against the petitioner. Those allegations are correct or not can only be decided in a trial. Thus, this Court cannot embark upon an enquiry as to whether the allegations against the petitioner are correct or not. 5. Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra & others, reported in AIR 2021 SC 1918, have laid down parameters for exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution, in such matters. 6. In such view of the matter, there is no scope for interference with the impugned FIR while exercising extraordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is dismissed. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 08.01.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d13 69512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610 C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.01.09 12:45:01 +05'30' 2025:UHC:301