Solanki @ Anshu @ Avinash Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./91012/2025 · 2026-04-06
Sandeep Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5729 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5729 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91012 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2025 Thana- PARWALPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Solanki @ Anshu @ Avinash Kumar S/O Uday Kumar Arya R/O Village- Rampur, P.S.- Aungari, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyaya, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 06-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Parwalpur P.S. Case No. 117/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, four unknown criminals looted one motorcycle belonging to the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned counsel further submits that he has five criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 28.07.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner on the ground that the name of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91012 of 2025(4) dt.06-04-2026 2/2 the petitioner has come in the self-inculpatory statement of the co-accused.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T