Sri Venkateswara Venkateswara Delux, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/7342/2021 · 2025-10-08
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57281 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57281 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010128442021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7342/2021 Between:
1. SRI VENKATESWARA VENKATESWARA DELUX,, AT MAIN ROAD, SALUR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY IT'S MANAGING PROPRIETOR PASUMARTHY SAI BABA, S/O. LATE SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. MAIN ROAD, SALUR TOWN, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRAPRADESH.
2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
3. THE SUB COLLECTOR, PARVATHIPURAM DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GORLE GOPALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7342 of 2021 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, to declare the action of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents and his subordinates in causing interference with the day to day business of the petitioner Theatre, without passing any orders on the Application Dt- 07.03.2019 submitted for renewal of the B-Form License of the petitioners theatre as being illegal arbitrary and in violation of the provisions of A.P Cinemas Regulation Rules 1970 and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to forthwith renew the Form-B license of the petitioner theatre and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case…”
2. None represented on behalf of the Petitioner. The proceeding sheet dated 24.09.2025 would also show that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance.
4. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution. No order as to Costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.10.2025. UPS
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No. 7342 of 2021
Dated.09.10.2025
UPS
120