Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57279 (AP)

Malle Lidiya v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/10349/2021 · 2025-10-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010176012021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10349/2021 Between: 1. MALLE LIDIYA, , W/O MANGALAGIRI RAHUL TEJA, AGED ABOUT 21 YRS, OCC- STUDENT, RIO. D.NO.14-5-41, VIJAYALAKSHMIPURAM, WARD NO31,BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BAPATLA TOWN P.S., GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 4. ASHOK KUMAR, , CIRCLE INSPECTOR, BAPATLA TOWN POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10349 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents, especially 3rd and 4th Respondent PS though the petitioner is not connected with any criminal case in any manner whatsoever as illegal arbitrary and unjust violative of principles of natural justice violative of fundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the 3rd and 4th respondents police station without following the procedure contemplated under law…” 2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the respondent police are not calling the petitioner to the police station, since no crime has been registered against her. 4. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station in absence of any crime against her. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.10.2025. UPS 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 10349 of 2021 Dated.09.10.2025 UPS 149