1 2025:CGHC:61264 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3791 of 2025 1. Sumitra Rajhansa W/o Neeru Rajhansa Aged About 60 Years R/o Ainlapali, Gudupada, P.S. Bhausuni, Dist. Boudh (Odisha) 2. Hasina Jal W/o. Purander Jal Aged About 42 Years R/o Tikirapada, Jethupali, At Present Ragudighura, P.S. Manamunda, Dist. Boudh (Odisha) 3. Champa Khura W/o Haai Khura, Aged About 36 Years R/o. Village Gaulpur, P.S. Manamunda, Dist. Boudh (Odisha) (Detail Of The Applicants Has Not Mentioned In Annexure A-1) … Petitioner versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Singhoda, Dist. Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondent For Petitioner : None. For Respondent : Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 16.12.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 07.10.2024, passed in MCRC No. 5780 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicants, namely, Sumitra Rajhansa, Hasina Jal and Champa Khura had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.12.17 11:05:51 +0530 2 law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. Earlier on occasion also, this Court had granted extension of time for conclusion of the trial vide order dated 12.06.2025 in CRMP No.1793/2025. 4. Learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Saraipali, District - Mahasamund (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 06.12.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from the perusal of the PUD that the case is fixed for securing the presence of accused Champa Khura. The accused is a resident of District Boudh, Odisha. An arrest warrant was issued against the accused; however, due to her absence, further proceedings in the case could not be carried out within the stipulated time. Hence, the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some more time. Therefore, he prays for grant of further time to conclude the same. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of four months from today. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti