APHC010603832007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 15678/2007 Between: 1. SENAGALA SURI BABU, S/O. LATE APPALASWAMY, EX. COMPOSITER AMBEDKAR POWER PRESS, SHOP NO. 19, VUDA, COMPLEX OPP: R.T.C. COMPLEX, R/O. ALTHI VEEDHI, DASANNAPETA, VIZIANAGARAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KOLLI NAGESWARA RAO 2 OTHERS, S/O. VENKANNA, PROPRIETOR OF AMBEDKAR POWER PRESS, SHOP NO.19, VUDA, COMPLEX OPP: R.T.C. COMPLEX, VIZIANAGARAM. 2. THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 48 OF A P SHOPS, & ESTABLISHMENTS ACT 1988, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 48 OF THE A P SHOPS, & ESTABLISHMENTS ACT 1988 & ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR VIZIANAGARAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF Certiorari, to call for the records relating to in connection with the impugned order passed in A.P.S.E.A. 7/2005 dated 13-10-2006 on the file of the 2nd respondent confirming the orders passed by 3rd respondent in case 2 F.A.No. 56/2003 dt. 2-5-2005 and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, improper and contrary to the provisions A.P. Shops and Establishment Act 1988 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 19879 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased expedite the hearing of the above WP by fixing an early date, and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GEDDAM SATISH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. TADDI NAGESWARA RAO 3 The Court made the following order: When the matter is taken up for consideration today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Perusal of record reveals that, on 30.08.2025, it was brought to the notice of this Court that the learned counsel for the petitioner is no more. Consequently, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Accordingly, notice was issued to the petitioner, however the same was returned unserved with an endorsement ‘Addressee deceased/expired. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 09.10.2025 MP 4 216 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION No.15678 of 2007 Dated : 09.10.2025 MP