Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57271 (DEL)

TINKU BABU & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

W.P.(C)/6928/2025 · 2025-05-21

Ajay Digpaul, C Hari Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 6928/2025 p. 1 $~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6928/2025 & CM APPL. 31378/2025 TINKU BABU & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Rhea Verma and Ms. Kavita Chaturwedi, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinay Yadav, SPC with Mr. Servesh P. Srivastva, GP, Mr. Ansh Kalra, Ms. Kamna Behrani and Mr. Divyanshu Sinha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 21.05.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. Against the orders of dismissal of the petitioners, it is an acknowledged position that the appeals filed by the petitioners are pending before the Appellate Authority. 2. We dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Appellate Authority to consider the averments in the present writ petition along with the contentions in the appeals filed before it by the petitioners against their orders of dismissal and pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within a period four weeks from today. W.P.(C) 6928/2025 p. 2 3. The decision, as and when taken, would be communicated to the petitioners. 4. Needless to say, the petitioners’ rights to challenge the decision, if adverse to them, shall stand reserved. 5. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. C.HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. MAY 21, 2025/AS Click here to check corrigendum, if any