APHC010550342007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3549] MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 591 OF 2007 Between: 1. T.JAYA RAMULU, NELLORE DISTRICT & ANOTHER, S/O.RAGHU RAMULU SANITARY SUPERVISOR GUDURU MUNICIPALITY, NELLORE DISTRICT 2. B.NARASIMHULU, S/O.NARASANNA SANITORY SUPERVISOR NANDYAL MUNICIPALITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP MUN ADMN HYDERABAD 12 OTHERS, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, MASAB TANK, HYDERABAD 3. B RAM MOHANSUPERINTENDENT O/O APUFIDC LTD, C/O.COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION MASAB TANK, HYDERABAD 4. K BHAGYA LAKSHMI SUPERINTENDENT O/O REGIONAL, DIRECTOR-CUM-APPELLATE COMMISSIONER, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 5. B VENKATA RAMANA SUPERINTENDENT O/O REGIONAL DIRECTOR, CUM-APPELLATE COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 6. P SAMPATH KUMARSUPERINTENDENT O/O CDMA, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION MASAB TANK,HYDERABAD 7. S VENKATA RAMANA SENIOR ASSISTANT O/O CDMA, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMN, MASAB TANK, HYDERABAD 8. B RAMULUSENIOR ASSISTANT O/O CDMA COMMISSIONER, OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, MASAB TANK, HYDERABAD 9. S J S PRASAD SANITARY SUPERVISOR TADEPALLIGUDEM, MUNICIPALITY, TADEPALLIGUDAM, W.G.DISTRICT 10. B RATHNAM SANITARY SUPERVISOR PRODDATUR MUNICIPALITY, PRODDATUR, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT 11. P KRISHNAIAH SANITARY SUPERVISOR TRIUPATI MUNICIPALITY, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 12. SK NABI SAHEB SANITARY SUPERVISOR ONGOLE MUNICIPALITY, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 13. K SUBBARATHNAM SANITARY SUPERVISOR, MADANAPALLY MUNICIPALITY, MADANAPALLY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DAMERLA RAVI KUMAR 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 3. . 4. VEDULA SRINIVAS The Court made the following ORDER: (Per NJS,J) This Writ Petition is of the year 2007 and, therefore, listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. When the matter is called in the morning, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even when the matter is called in the afternoon also there is no representation. From this, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter. Under the aforementioned circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. NINALA JAYASURYA,J TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J Date:13.10.2025 Ssv THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 591 OF 2007 Date:13.10.2025. Ssv