APHC010276182019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 12605/2019 Between: 1. PAYYAVULAVENKATARAMANAPPA, S/O P BHASKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, BOMMANAHALL VILLAGE AND MANDAL ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS VELAGAPUDI,VIJAYAWADA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS GOLLAPUDI, VIJ AYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS, KURNOOL TOWN. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS, ANANTAPURAMU TOWN. 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS RAYADURG GROUP TEMPLES RAYADURG TOWN AND MANDAL. 6. THE INSPECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS URAVAKONDA. 7. J JITHENDRA, S/O J. RAJGOPAL OCC JUNIOR ASSISTANT RAYADURG GROUP TEMPLES DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS RAYADURG TOWN AND MANDAL. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KARNAM RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMAREGION) 2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 3. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.12605 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of mandamusdeclaring the inaction of the respondents No.1 to 6 in taking appropriate action in respect of my representations dated 17.07.2017, 24.01.2018 and 08.03.2019 made to respondents No.2 and 3 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to take appropriate action against the respondent No.7 as per the law governing the issue and may pass…” 2. Sri Karanam Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through video conference would submit that the petitioner is no more and as per the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, enquiry was also completed. 3. In that view of the matter, the cause does not survive for further adjudication and the writ petition may be closed 4. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 09.10.2025 Pmk 4 21 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:12605 OF 2019 Date: 09.10.2025 Pmk